The Real 21st-Century Problem in Public Education isPoverty
I picked the title above from a discussion on Linkedin in the internet. I believe articles like this will be leading the masses to bark up the wrong tree.
"The October 2013 Southern Education Foundation study indicates clearly that poverty, which has long been the biggest obstacle to educational achievement, is more important than ever. It is our true 21st century problem.A large and growing proportion of US students live in poverty and even concentrated poverty, have a disability, and/or are learning English as a second language. THAT is the paradigm shift, and we need a totally new set of policies to address that 21st century reality.We do have a 21st century education crisis – poverty. Until we properly diagnose the illness, however, our prescribed remedies will continue to fall far short."
I believe poverty (the state of being extremely poor) is a problem but not necessarily the biggest problem in public education.
The following is what Sr.Susan J.Brien had said in Linkedin
The following are comments from an article I had read.
Here is an extract from another article.There are examples of schools that have been successful in improving the academic outcomes of students despite poverty. Mostly, they collaborated with the larger school community and together, supported student needs. Poverty is a HUGE factor in challenging academic success for students, but it is by no means, the only predictor for their future success. IT CAN BE DONE (read K. Chenoweth) If there are committed adults who are willing to invest in the future of students. It is not working harder, but smarter. It can be done.
Kids are not
learning basic concepts of Math, English and Science. Since when do elementary age students need to act like they're working in corporate America and we all know that is not about 'teamwork' but about 'power' to control others. Sure, 'teamwork' on projects is important but it should not remove the teacher from actually teaching.
You people are just full of IT! You don't have to be rich to learn..... Why do I hear this only in USA? Is this your motto? You have to be rich to be educated? I am from a tiny country and from even tinnier village. I walked to school every day. I went to a public school where you had to bring your own toilet paper, because school didn't provide it. You had to buy some crayons, pencils, erasers and notebooks. Books were for free........I speak 2 different languages, I have a master degree, I used to be a professional tennis player and I have a great career. But I can assure you- it was not money that gave me education. It was my parents and my approach of life.
One teacher told this one great example:
"I teach children of all races. Black children for some reason always lack less vocabulary than other kids. They are behind with reading, they can't spell, and they have problems with math as well....... Lots of people tell me that they do not have the same conditions to learn as white children. Well I say this to them: Library and Books are free for everybody"
If you want to make an excuse for why we have problems in education, you can always find it. You just found it...........but poverty is not the good one.
I'm the result of several generations of poor people reproducing. We have our share of jailbirds, drug addicts and alcoholics, but not every one of us is like that. My mother and her family were legitimately poor, not even having electricity or running water, or even indoor plumbing on a consistent basis. Yet, despite these obstacles or maybe because of them, she and all of her siblings rose above their "class" and their children (me included) are going even further. My mother works as an office manager, when her parents were an oil rig worker and a maid, respectively. I became the first person in my family to graduate from college, and I'm a certified educator AND I'm studying to get my master's in microbiology. My cousin is an engineer. We're "moving up." So yeah, poor people deserve to have children too. You never know what's going to happen. :)
And another comment:
As a poor parent of a child in a poor, under-performing school, I can speak to some of this.One more comment:
It's frustrating to hear people complain that a teacher who earns seven times my household income is underpaid. It's similarly frustrating to relinquish my child to the state for six hours a day, five days a week, only to hear these professional educators complain that, when they fail, it's the parents' fault.
It's frustrating to know that if I had the luxury of time to home-school my child, he'd be exposed to so much more than he is in school.
It's frustrating, when I pick my son up after school, to hear him all excited--not because he learned something exciting or acquired a new skill or built something he's proud of, but because he got a good behavior rating for the day. I worry that a school that stresses conformity over creativity and academic performance is little more than a holding cell.
As I struggle to pull myself up by the bootstraps so I'll have a profitable farm to leave to my children, it frustrates me to see signs of an educational system geared toward programming children to believe that their only option in life is to become someone else's employee.
One final comment:
Teacher: "I have students (from poor families) who smoke dope and other drugs daily and who are absent constantly."
Commentator: I grew up middle class and went to a private middle school. They have those problems in there, too. It's a result of bad parenting, which is not at all the exclusive domain of the poor.
There is more to come on this in my next post.