Teaching the wrong way and blaming the child

 

Here is a Facebook post saying what I have been saying since 2010.

Enid Bailot on Dyslexia – on FB.2.10.2026

Research suggests most dyslexic preschoolers are happy and well adjusted. The emotional problems start when early reading instruction doesn't match their needs. Kids with learning disabilities often carry anxiety, isolation, and shame into the classroom every day. Dyslexic students are more likely to drop out. They face a higher risk of depression, substance use, and even suicide. In one Texas study, nearly half of prison inmates were dyslexic.

None of that is caused by dyslexia. It's caused by years of being taught the wrong way and told it was their fault.

Dyslexics and Spelling

 

On 5 July 2020, I received the following message on Facebook Messenger from a lady in Kenya:

Dear Luqman, I have been following your blogs and you seem to understand these children and able to help them. I have a 11 year old who is showing the signs of shut down in her writing. I would appreciate if you can help through Zoom. Kind Regards.

 

Her concern was that her 11-year-old daughter was consistently failing her English essay tests.

The Hidden Challenge of Teaching Reading in a Syllabic Language Environment

 

Precisely because our local environment leans heavily syllabic, teaching pure, clipped, individual letter sounds is the critical bridge our students need to conquer English.

In a syllable-based language environment, students naturally look for vowel anchors. If we teach them that a consonant includes an additional vowel sound, we distort the actual building blocks of decoding.

Two Truths the Research Is Finally Catching Up To

                                                  

Since I began writing about literacy in 2010, I have repeatedly highlighted two core reasons why many Malaysian children struggle to learn to read. For years, these observations received little attention from commercial programmes, local academic institutions, and successive Education Ministers. Yet literacy research over the past decade has increasingly moved in a direction consistent with what I have observed through one-to-one work with struggling readers in Sabah.

The Debate We Should Have Had All Along

 

Yesterday, I wrote about what happens when an idea finally begins to roll. The discussion centred on something I have been advocating for many years: teaching children the correct sounds of letters.

What some readers may not realize is that I was writing about this as early as 2010 and 2012. LINK 

When an Idea Finally Begins to Roll

 

For many years I have made a simple observation.

When we teach the sound of the letter b, many of us do not say /b/. We say "buh." When we teach the sound of the letter t, many of us do not say /t/. We say "tuh." Likewise, /k/ often becomes "kuh" or "cuh."

Universal Screening That Starts with the Sounds Kids Actually Know

 

For more than a decade I have argued that a major, under-recognized cause of early reading failure is children being taught the wrong sounds of letters. When consonants are taught with an added “uh” (the schwa)—“buh,” “cuh,” “duh” instead of the pure /b/, /k/, /d/—blending becomes unnecessarily hard. Children try to say “cuh-ah-tuh” and struggle to hear the word cat. The confusion leads many of them to shut down. Once the pure sounds are taught and practiced, that particular source of confusion drops away and most children can begin to decode.

Before We Talk About Comprehension, Can the Child Actually Read?

 

Millions of older students are being treated for comprehension problems when their real literacy difficulties remain unaddressed.

When literacy experts say, "Once a child learns to decode, the hard part of reading is far from over," they are partly right. Vocabulary matters. Background knowledge matters. Syntax matters. Comprehension certainly matters. But there is a problem hidden inside that statement. It assumes that children have actually learned to decode.

For many students, that assumption is false.

There Was Never a Golden Age. That Is Not the Defence Paul Thomas Thinks It Is.

These are further thoughts on my previous post at LINK. 

Paul Thomas asks whether “kids today can’t read” is a real crisis or, as Chris Ferguson suggests, a perennial gripe. His answer rests on two observations. Adults have always complained about the young. And nobody can point to a golden age when nearly all children left school able to read well.

Both can be granted. Neither answers the question that matters.

The Real Mystery of Reading

 

Why Fluent Readers Are Not the Mystery. The Real Mystery Is Why Some Curious Children Shut Down.

 

A few weeks ago, I posed what I thought was a simple question on Substack:

                                Does anyone know how a child learns to read?

The Pot, the Kettle, and the Reading Wars

 

The Questions Lyn Stone Never Answered

I recently read a post by Lyn Stone in which she expressed concern about Lucy Calkins appearing at a reading conference. Stone wrote that she is "interested in accountability before reconciliation" and suggested that before being welcomed, Calkins should publicly acknowledge where she was wrong, apologise for the damage caused, and explain what she is doing now to correct it.

On that principle, I have no disagreement.

When an Idea Cannot Be Refuted, It Is Often Ignored

 

More than six years ago, I wrote a post titled People Prefer to Believe a Myth. Instead of Examining the Evidence. Little has changed.

Perhaps the Question Isn't Whether Kids Can Read, But Why Some Can't

 

I posted a Substack note on Paul Thomas’s post and he referred me to another post of his.

I think Paul has finally framed the issue in a way that allows for a more productive discussion. Rather than arguing over whether there is a "reading crisis," he is asking deeper historical questions.

Here is my response:

The Science of Reading Belongs in Tier 1. But Is That Enough?

 

I recently came across an article arguing that the Science of Reading belongs in Tier 1 instruction and should not be reserved for expensive private schools, tutors, and dyslexia specialists.

On that point, I completely agree.

Is There Really No Reading Crisis? Responding to Paul thomas

 

Responding to Paul Thomas on Crisis, Faddism, and Educational Reform

I recently read a Substack article by Paul Thomas titled "The More Things Change ... : The Bi-Partisan Failure of Public Education (SC Edition)." It is a thought-provoking piece that challenges decades of educational reform in South Carolina and the United States.

Thomas argues that politicians and education marketers have created a perpetual cycle of crisis, reform, and disappointment. One generation is told that schools are failing. New standards are introduced. New training programmes are purchased. New materials are sold. A few years later, another crisis is declared, another reform is launched, and the cycle begins again.