Many
months ago I received an e-mail from someone who chanced upon my blog. This is
what she had written.
“I work with kids, mostly under the age
of ten, who are struggling in school. I have found your posts
informative.
On the phrase "learning disability" (LD) -- it means two entirely different things in the UK and in the US/Canada.
In the UK, LD refers to people who have significant cognitive or intellectual impairments -- what previously might have been termed "mentally retarded" (now pejorative in the US).
In the US/Canada, LD refers to people who have at least normal cognitive or intellectual abilities who struggle with one or more areas of learning (reading, writing, math)”.
On the phrase "learning disability" (LD) -- it means two entirely different things in the UK and in the US/Canada.
In the UK, LD refers to people who have significant cognitive or intellectual impairments -- what previously might have been termed "mentally retarded" (now pejorative in the US).
In the US/Canada, LD refers to people who have at least normal cognitive or intellectual abilities who struggle with one or more areas of learning (reading, writing, math)”.
End of message.
This is rather interesting. This is
probably why the people I wrote to in England find it difficult to accept my
findings despite the numerous research reports in my blog.
All the students whom I have taught are
students with normal cognitive or intellectual intelligence. All of them had a
problem in reading English whilst they read fluently in Malay and and some in Han Yu Pin
Yin (Romanized Mandarin).
Most of my students were certified
dyslexic by experts in West Malaysia or Singapore even though they could read
fluently in Malay. (One of the ‘revered
professors’, Linda Siegel wrote to me and said “The claim that Luqman
Michel makes is that “dyslexics” can read fluently in Malay. If they can
read fluently, then they are not dyslexics.”
She is one of those who speak based on what others have written before
her. She has no regard for researchers who have written about dyslexics who read fluently in other languages. She is exactly like what the Indian proverb
say about one who has caught a three legged rabbit and claim all rabbits are
three legged. The good thing about Linda is that, at least, she like Dr.Joseph Torgesen
replied my e-mail unlike all the other professors I had written to.)
I believe that people with significant
cognitive or intellectual impairment should not be placed in the same category
as dyslexics. Dyslexics are average or above average intelligent people. They
learn in a different way and are very logical thinking people. They have no
problem learning anything that is logical. They however, have problems
accepting things that are illogical and their minds literally shut down when
asked to learn illogical things. Once they understand the concept they learn at
a fast rate.
Perhaps a clearer definition of dyslexics
should be looked into. It would be a travesty to include those with
intellectual impairment in the same class as the geniuses that we know.
Together with you, I would like to
explore why children, dyslexic or otherwise, shut down. Do give me your views
and any article you may have come across which could help us in this journey.
2 comments:
This is not a disease and you can't catch it. This is a learning disability which can make reading and writing more difficult, and sometimes people get it in maths too. But it doesn't mean they aren't intelligent, I have Dyslexic friends who got A*s in a lot of their exams.
Hi Brenda, Thank you for your comment. I completely agree with you.
Many of the rich and famous are dyslexics.There is no question on their intelligence.
Post a Comment