‘Disengaged
students’ or students who have ‘shut down’
All the
'dyslexic' students I have taught over the past 11 years have no problem reading in the
Malay language. Those who study in Chinese schools can also read fluently in Romanised
Chinese (Hanyu Pinyin).
I
believe many children cannot read but do not have many of the problems included in many definitions of dyslexia on the internet. This web log is
not for parents of kids who have a ‘Auditory Processing Disorder’ or acuity
problem. This web log is for kids who cannot read in the English Language
because they have shut down or disengaged themselves from what the teacher
teaches. They disengage because the English language does not make sense to
them. Kids shut-down when teachers do not teach these kids that many of the
letters of the alphabet in the English language represent more than one phoneme (sound). As such a
majority of the kids who end up being unable to read are simply kids who have
shut down or disengaged from what is being taught because they have not been
taught correctly.
Dyslexia as defined by Stanovich:
“Standard exclusionary criteria include conditions that began or existed before school entry such as severe attentional problems, mental retardation,
oral language impairment, emotional disturbance and/or behavioural
difficulties, deficits in hearing or visual acuity, neurological disorders such
as autism or childhood schizophrenia, or chronically poor health. Historically,
the notion of “unexpected underachievement” has been the central defining feature
of dyslexia. Children are identified as
having dyslexia only when factors that would be expected to cause problems in
all areas of learning, not just reading, are excluded (not ruling out the
possibility of comorbidity). For example, children with severe attentional
problems would be expected to have problems in all areas of learning, not just
reading and writing. Such children should therefore not be diagnosed as having
dyslexia. Similarly, children with deficits in auditory acuity due to otitis
media (or “glue ear”), for example, would be expected to have trouble with
learning in general, because their deficits in auditory discrimination would
impede oral language development, which in turn would make understanding
classroom instruction in all areas of learning difficult. These examples relate
to a core assumption of dyslexia, which is the assumption of specificity, the
notion that the child diagnosed with dyslexia has a deficit that is reasonably
specific to the literacy learning task; that is, the deficits displayed by such children
should not extend too far into other areas of cognitive functioning”
(Stanovich, 1991).
Despite all the scientific progress in the world over the past 50 years or so the percentage of students who drop out of school as illiterates has not come down. We have to ask ourselves as to why this is so.
This Blog post is for parents with children who cannot read in the English language. I have successfully taught many kids who were sent to me by anxious parents who could not understand why their kids could not read in English despite being very clever in many other fields.
1 comment:
This morning - 14.3.2015, I happened to read a blog post where the writer had said the following: "While many of these kids FREAK OUT and give up on the passage, story, or book altogether, others end up either guessing what the word says, skipping over it as if it never existed, or mumbling through it, hoping you won't notice and call their attention back to it".
It is the word 'freak out' that is significant for my post here. researchers should ask why these kids 'freak out', 'disengage' or shut-down'. The answer to this question and the action taken will reduce the level of illiteracy.
Post a Comment