Showing posts with label Lucy Calkins. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lucy Calkins. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Irresponsible teachers


 

I am recording this in my blog for posterity. This shows the irresponsible people who write whatever comes to their minds without thinking about how it affects others.The irresponsible comments below refer to a Heinemann Reading Curriculum.


Kathleen Seeman, MEdKathleen Seeman, MEd  • 1st • 1st Dyslexia Specialist and Interventionist, Master Teacher, Educator, AdvocateDyslexia.

WOW!! About time this wrong is righted! “The case could also break new legal ground. Stuart Rossman, who oversaw litigation at the National Consumer Law Center for 25 years, said he wasn’t aware of any previous class-action lawsuits over literacy curricula”

Sunday, December 8, 2024

Mary McCool Berry’s comment on the Boston Globe’s Report

 



Here is a post on LinkedIn by one podcast host who is trying to make hay while the sun shines.

Mary McCool Berry, M.Ed., W.D.T.

Wilson Dyslexia Therapist | Instructional Design Specialist | Certified Dyslexia Advocate | Podcast Host

๐“๐ž๐š๐œ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐œ๐š๐ง๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐›๐ž ๐›๐ฅ๐š๐ฆ๐ž๐. ๐€๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐š๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ฌ๐ž ๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐š๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ง๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐ซ๐ž๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐›๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ฆ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ซ๐š๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐จ๐›๐ฃ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ.

๐“๐จ๐จ ๐ฆ๐š๐ง๐ฒ ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ซ๐ž๐ง ๐๐ข๐ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ฅ๐ž๐š๐ซ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ ๐š๐ฌ ๐š ๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ.

Sunday, October 8, 2023

Dyslexia – What % of the world is dyslexic

                                                       


Here are a few tweets and my response.

Luqman Michel @luqmanmichel

Most of the so-called dyslexic kids are kids who have disengaged from learning to read due to confusion. They shut down from learning to read. Get rid of the root causes and you will not have to blame Phonics or Lucy Calkins or BL.

Teaching EcoSystems Matter @CreditFlex

Not sure I’d say “most”. But really have had difficulty narrowing down the real percentage.

Luqman Michel @luqmanmichel

The dyslexia advocates try to convince the world it is around 15 to 20%. Some researchers have said it is about 2 %. Recently David Boulton said it s/b around 3 to 5 %.

Here is the latest discussion between David Boulton and Andrew Johnson where this is mentioned. LINK

Saturday, October 7, 2023

When does one size fit all

                                                     


On 6.10.23 in a Twitter thread Dr. Sam Bommarito Twitted the following:

Dr. Sam Bommarito @DoctorSam7

One of the many reasons I speak out against one-size-fits-all solutions is that different children really do need different things. What works with one does not always work with another. Many adults who were Dyslexic as a child have found ways to succeed. One of my favorite stories along that line is the story of this mother and daughter team, who saw the strengths in themselves and shared with others how to use those strengths. They replace "succeeding despite of Dyslexia" with "succeeding because of Dyslexia". 

Dr. Sam keeps saying the same things over and over because, as I have said several times, the mind of most people is like the human egg. 

Thursday, June 22, 2023

Right to read - Movie Review – Part 1

 

I watched the movie Right to Read and think it is propaganda to brainwash the Americans to get rid of Lucy Calkins's books and discount Balanced Literature.

Here are some excerpts from the movie and my questions and comments.

At minute 14.20: Kareem - The question is what becomes of those kids who don’t have a foundation in reading? The Lord works in mysterious ways. Kids overcome all kinds of challenges.

Tuesday, May 24, 2022

Has Lucy Calkins hoodwinked anyone?

 


I tweeted the following and received a tweet in response from Karen Vaites.

Luqman Michel @luqmanmichel May 23

'She is only now embracing reading research that is >20 years old.'

Some say 50 years.

Where were the teachers and educators during these past 20 to 50 years?

Karen Vaites @karenvaites Replying to @luqmanmichel and @DanaGoldstein

It’s a fair question, but when a woman at @Columbia @TeachersCollege tells you her program is evidence-based, I can understand people getting hoodwinked.

Monday, May 23, 2022

Swarm behaviour by Twitters

 


This morning, 23.5.2022, I read many tweets referring to a post in New York Times.

There was only one educator, Jerusha Beckerman, who spoke her mind instead of following the crowd.

Here are a few of the many tweets and my comments.

Jodi Snowdon @joleigh_snow

Simple fact- if you don’t know the code, you can’t learn to read. You can guess but it won’t take you far enough to reach your potential.